Kershaw County Council Recap KERSHAW COUNTY COUNCIL RECAP Kershaw County, South Carolina Latest issueArchiveCounty mapProjectsCouncilRoadmapFeedbackSubscribeAbout
Meeting Recap
October 8, 2024
In 30 seconds  16 votes · 16 passed · 3 contested
16
Votes passed
0
Votes failed
3
Split votes
Go to the source
Official minutes (kershaw.sc.gov) »Full transcript »
+Your local business here. One sponsor per recap keeps this free for every neighbor. Sponsor a recap »

The headline

Council moved to clarify the reporting structure and duties of the Clerk to County Council. Following an executive session, the council voted to formally standardize the Clerk's duties to be split between the County Administrator and the County Council, with the Chairperson serving as the primary point of contact for council-specific assignments.

Clarify duties and supervision of Clerk to County Council: Council formalized the Clerk's reporting structure to be split between Administration and the Chairperson.
     Yes 5 · No 1
detailsless
How they voted
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Danny Catoe✗ Jimmy Jones
What this was about
Following executive session, Council formalized the reporting structure for the Clerk to County Council to ensure duties are consistently applied. The Clerk will divide time between County Administration and County Council. The County Administrator will supervise the office for daily affairs, while the Council, via majority vote, holds ultimate authority. Specifically, for council-related assignments, the Clerk will be available to all members but will report directly to the Chairperson for questions, concerns, or disputes. Councilman Jimmy Jones opposed the motion, citing concerns, while the remaining members approved the change. This measure aims to provide clarity and prevent confusion in the reporting hierarchy, which Councilman Sammie Tucker described as a ratification of established job descriptions to better serve the organization.

PASSED    For 5 · Against 1

Votes at a glance tap to showtap to hide
Amend agenda to remove Item 6B (Solar Farm Public Hearing): Council removed an agenda item because a required public hearing had already taken place elsewhere.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
This measure sought to remove Case 24-24 from the public hearing portion of the meeting agenda. Councilman Derek Shoemake initiated the motion, noting that the required public hearing for the zoning amendment had already been successfully conducted during the Planning Commission's previous meeting. Because the hearing had already satisfied the legal requirements, holding another one during the County Council session was deemed unnecessary and redundant. The Council voted unanimously to adopt this amendment to the agenda. This action reflects the Council's effort to streamline its meeting proceedings and avoid repeating administrative tasks that have already been fulfilled. No members voiced opposition, and the item was promptly removed to allow Council to proceed with the remaining business items on the docket.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Adopt the agenda as amended: Council approved the revised agenda, which included the removal of the solar farm hearing.
     Yes 5 · No 1
detailsless
How they voted
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Danny Catoe✗ Jimmy Jones
What this was about
Following the earlier amendment to remove the solar farm public hearing, Chairman Ben Connell called for a vote to finalize the meeting agenda. The agenda serves as the roadmap for the session, outlining all topics, public hearings, and votes scheduled for the evening. Councilman Jimmy Jones was the sole member to oppose the adoption of the agenda. The motion passed with a 5-1 vote, allowing the meeting to move forward according to the reordered schedule. Adopting the agenda is a procedural formality necessary to conduct legal business, ensuring that members of the public and the Council have a clear understanding of the items under consideration. This step confirms the items that were successfully added, removed, or reordered during the preliminary adoption process.

PASSED    For 5 · Against 1

Approval of minutes for September 24, 2024: The Council unanimously approved the official minutes from their previous meeting on September 24.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
Council members voted to formally accept the minutes from the September 24, 2024, meeting. Minutes serve as the official legal record of all actions, discussions, and motions taken during a public council meeting. By approving them, the Council confirms the accuracy of the proceedings and ensures they remain a permanent part of the county's historical records. This is a standard administrative task performed at the beginning of each meeting cycle. All present members voted in favor, with no corrections or disputes raised regarding the content of the document.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Case 24-22 - Zoning amendment regarding solar energy farm community meetings (2nd Reading): Council passed a zoning amendment requiring solar farm applicants to hold community information meetings. Development
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
This ordinance amends the Unified Code of Zoning and Land Development Regulations to mandate that applicants for large-scale solar farms hold a community meeting before submitting conditional use applications. The measure also requires applicants to notify property owners within a one-mile radius of the project boundary and provide a summary of the meeting to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission added the one-mile notification requirement to the initial draft. This policy aims to ensure that local communities are better informed and have a voice in large-scale land use decisions that affect their neighborhoods. The Council passed the second reading unanimously, signaling broad support for increased transparency and public engagement in solar energy development. The ordinance will now proceed toward finalization, with potential for further minor adjustments in future readings.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Case 24-24 - Rezoning 10.43 acres from RD-2 to GD (2nd Reading): Council approved the rezoning of 10.43 acres in Cassatt for a proposed barber shop and garage. Development
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
The Council approved the second reading of a zoning map amendment for a 10.43-acre parcel located at 1750 Highway 1 North in Cassatt. The property is being rezoned from RD-2 (Rural Resource District) to GD (General Development District). The landowner, who was present at the first reading, expressed intent to construct a barber shop and a garage on the site. This rezoning is intended to facilitate local business development in the Cassatt community. The Council's unanimous support during the second reading indicates that there are no remaining objections to the proposed land use change. Following this vote, the ordinance moves closer to final adoption, enabling the property owner to proceed with their development plans under the new zoning classification.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Three-part amendment to Community Medical Clinic land ordinance: Council adopted a three-part amendment to provide the clinic with more flexibility in future property use.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
Councilman Derek Shoemake introduced a three-part amendment to the ordinance conveying land to the Community Medical Clinic. The amendment allows the clinic to sell the property or use proceeds from a sale to purchase or construct a new clinic facility within Kershaw County, or to donate funds to eleemosynary purposes, without needing further Council approval for those specific uses. Additionally, it removes certain deed restrictions regarding conveyance and mandates that the County Attorney work with the clinic's board to ensure the deed language is appropriate. The amendments were requested by the clinic's legal counsel to support their long-term growth and facility needs. The Council unanimously approved the changes, reflecting a desire to support the clinic's mission while maintaining public oversight of the assets.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Community Medical Clinic land ordinance (2nd Reading): Council passed the second reading of an ordinance to convey land to the Community Medical Clinic.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
This ordinance authorizes the conveyance of a one-acre parcel to the Community Medical Clinic, a non-profit organization that has operated on the site for 20 years under a 2004 memorandum of understanding. The agreement stipulated that the land and improvements would transfer to the clinic after 20 years, an agreement that has now reached its term. The ordinance serves to finalize this transition and clear the property title. The clinic's leadership, including Board Chairman Harvey Galloway and Judge Thomas Cooper, expressed appreciation for the Council's cooperation in the matter. By passing the second reading, the Council reaffirms its commitment to the clinic's long-term stability and its role in providing essential health care services to Kershaw County residents.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Inducement Resolution for Project New Life: Council approved a resolution for a tax incentive agreement involving a $16 million business investment.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
The Council adopted an inducement resolution to negotiate a Fee in Lieu of Tax (FILOT) agreement for 'Project New Life.' This economic development project is projected to invest approximately $16,050,000 in the county and create at least 32 full-time jobs. These agreements are standard tools used by local governments to attract and retain businesses by providing a predictable tax structure. The specific details of the project remain confidential to protect the company's competitive position during the expansion process. Chairman Ben Connell and other members expressed enthusiasm for the job growth and capital investment the project brings to the county. The resolution is the first formal step in the economic development process, which will include subsequent readings and final vote approval.

PASSED (Unanimous, 5-0)

About this project: Project New »
Award bid for Airport Hanger 1 and 2A Roof Project: Council awarded a $339,380 bid to Johnson-Laux Construction for critical airport hanger roof repairs.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
The Council voted to award a $339,380.54 contract to Johnson-Laux Construction for roofing repairs on Airport Hangers 1 and 2A. These structures, dating back to the World War II era, have suffered from persistent leaks. The County utilized a cooperative purchasing agreement to expedite the bid process, which is permitted under South Carolina law and has been successfully used for other major county facility projects. The awarded amount is below the $350,000 budget allocated for this project. Administrator Danny Templar noted that this procurement method helps streamline complex repairs while maintaining competitiveness. The roof project is essential for preserving county assets and ensuring the safety and functionality of airport facilities.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Appoint Jonathan Proctor to Planning Commission: Council unanimously appointed Jonathan Proctor to fill the District 4 vacancy on the Planning Commission. DevelopmentAppointments
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
Councilman Jimmy Jones motioned to appoint Jonathan Proctor to fill a vacancy on the Planning Commission for District 4. The Planning Commission plays a pivotal role in the county's growth, including developing the comprehensive plan and updating zoning codes. Members expressed strong support for the appointment, citing a need for young, bright minds to help guide the county's future. Mr. Proctor's appointment was confirmed by a unanimous vote. The appointment is a standard procedure to ensure all planning districts have active representation, ensuring the Commission can continue its work on land use and development policies with a full slate of members.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Appoint Ben Connell to Santee-Lynches COG Board: Council appointed Chairman Ben Connell to the Santee-Lynches Council of Governments board. Appointments
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
The Council appointed Chairman Ben Connell to serve as the representative on the Santee-Lynches Council of Governments (COG) board. The COG works across four counties to coordinate regional infrastructure projects, including transportation, roads, and bridges. Council members noted that having the Council Chairman serving on the COG board is strategically beneficial for securing regional funding and maintaining local influence. Vice-Chairman Russell Brazell initiated the motion, and the appointment was approved unanimously. This role is essential for ensuring that Kershaw County's needs and interests are actively advocated for at the regional level, particularly concerning infrastructure improvements that span county boundaries.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Appoint Danny Catoe to the Opioid Coalition: Council appointed Councilman Danny Catoe to represent the county on the Opioid Coalition. Appointments
   Yes 5 · No 0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
The Council appointed Councilman Danny Catoe to represent Kershaw County on the Opioid Coalition. This group oversees the allocation of opioid settlement funds, a significant financial resource that will support addiction treatment and community health programs for years to come. Councilman Sammie Tucker noted that Councilman Catoe's law enforcement background and experience in narcotics investigation make him an ideal fit for the role. Councilman Jimmy Jones abstained from the vote due to a conflict of interest. The remaining members voted 5-0 to approve the appointment. Mr. Catoe's role will involve helping the county make informed decisions on how to effectively distribute settlement resources to mitigate the impact of the opioid crisis.

PASSED  For 5 · Against 0 (J. Jones abstained)

Enter Executive Session: Council voted 5-1 to enter executive session to discuss legal and personnel matters.
     Yes 5 · No 1
detailsless
How they voted
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Danny Catoe✗ Jimmy Jones
What this was about
The Council voted to enter an executive session to receive legal briefings regarding ADA compliance, airport-related contracts, and a personnel matter concerning the Clerk to Council's duties. Executive sessions are held in private to allow Council members to discuss sensitive legal or personnel information that is protected by the Freedom of Information Act. Councilman Jimmy Jones voted against the motion to enter the session, preferring that matters be discussed in an open forum. Following the vote, the Council recessed into the private session and eventually returned to regular meeting procedures to report their actions.

PASSED    For 5 · Against 1

Exit Executive Session: Council voted to exit the executive session and return to open session.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
Following the private discussion regarding legal and personnel issues, the Council voted unanimously to exit the executive session. Exiting the session marks the return to public meeting proceedings, where the Council is required to disclose any actions or votes taken during the private meeting. This transition back to the open session ensures transparency in the Council's decision-making process. The session concluded at 8:25 p.m., after which the Council proceeded to formalize the personnel decision regarding the Clerk to County Council in the presence of the public.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Clarify duties and supervision of Clerk to County Council: Council formalized the Clerk's reporting structure to be split between Administration and the Chairperson.
     Yes 5 · No 1
detailsless
How they voted
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Danny Catoe✗ Jimmy Jones
What this was about
Following executive session, Council formalized the reporting structure for the Clerk to County Council to ensure duties are consistently applied. The Clerk will divide time between County Administration and County Council. The County Administrator will supervise the office for daily affairs, while the Council, via majority vote, holds ultimate authority. Specifically, for council-related assignments, the Clerk will be available to all members but will report directly to the Chairperson for questions, concerns, or disputes. Councilman Jimmy Jones opposed the motion, citing concerns, while the remaining members approved the change. This measure aims to provide clarity and prevent confusion in the reporting hierarchy, which Councilman Sammie Tucker described as a ratification of established job descriptions to better serve the organization.

PASSED    For 5 · Against 1

Adjourn the meeting: Council voted unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
   Unanimous · 7-0
detailsless
How they voted - unanimous
✓ Ben Connell✓ Russell Brazell✓ Sammie Tucker Jr.✓ Derek Shoemake✓ Jimmy Jones✓ Brant Tomlinson✓ Danny Catoe
What this was about
The meeting was officially adjourned at 8:30 p.m. following a motion by Councilman Sammie Tucker and a second by Vice-Chairman Russell Brazell. This final act formally concludes the business of the Council for the October 8, 2024, session. All members present voted in favor of the adjournment. The conclusion of the meeting signifies that all agenda items, public comments, and administrative tasks required for the evening were addressed. The next regular Council meeting will continue with ongoing county projects and legislative business as scheduled.

PASSED (Unanimous)

Discussed, no vote tap to showtap to hide
  • Planning and Zoning Staffing and Contracts: Councilman Jimmy Jones requested information on costs and staffing for Planning and Zoning, specifically regarding contract agencies like SafeBuilt. The Administrator noted that contract agencies serve as a temporary bridge to maintain operations while recruiting for permanent staff.
  • Boat Ramp Update: Alliance Consulting Engineers provided an update on the Veterans Park Boat Ramp. Advertising for bids is scheduled for October 14, with a goal of opening bids in mid-November and beginning construction shortly thereafter.
  • Code of Ordinances Update: The Administrator provided an update on the transition to the Municode system, noting that the county is working to reduce the lag time between the passage of ordinances and their digital publication.
  • General Housekeeping: Council approved deferring the ATAX Committee appointment until the first meeting in November.
Public comment tap to showtap to hide
  • Tom Webb III: Spoke regarding the county's litter ordinance, characterizing certain provisions as overly broad and excessive.

This is an independent summary prepared from the county's official published minutes and the meeting's live stream, not an official county communication.

Share this recap
FacebookX / TwitterCopy linkSee a mistake?
How this recap was made: Prepared from the county's official minutes (the verified vote record) combined with the meeting's live stream (quotes and discussion). This is an automated summary written by software (a neural-network summarizer working from the documents above), not by a person, so please rely on the official county record for anything important.
Never miss a vote. It's free.
Get every recap in your inbox the day it's ready - free, no catch, unsubscribe anytime. Supported by local sponsors, not subscriptions.
Kershaw County Council Recap KERSHAW COUNTY COUNCIL RECAP Kershaw County, South Carolina Latest issue Archive Projects Council About
Independent community summary · not an official county communication  ·  Feedback · Roadmap · Advertise · Privacy · Terms · Contact
© 2026 Wateree Media LLC. All rights reserved.  ·  Last updated August 27, 2026